<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunscreens &#8211; why you should use them daily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://colinsbeautypages.co.uk/sunscreens-why-you-should-use-them-daily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://colinsbeautypages.co.uk/sunscreens-why-you-should-use-them-daily/</link>
	<description>A cosmetic scientist shares his news and views on beauty products and the science behind them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Trae</title>
		<link>http://colinsbeautypages.co.uk/sunscreens-why-you-should-use-them-daily/comment-page-1/#comment-49360</link>
		<dc:creator>Trae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 09:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colinsbeautypages.co.uk/?p=120#comment-49360</guid>
		<description>Really enjoyed this article, Colin. It&#039;s great to hear a cosmetic chemist&#039;s perspective on the issue of sunscreens. I&#039;m currently experimenting more with physical sunscreens myself, as I have sensitive skin and most chemical sunscreens always seem to sting when I apply them. It seems that there are an increasing number of SPF 30 and higher physical screens becoming available here, as dermatologists in the US seem to really push a minimum of SPF 30 for daily facial use, though, as you mentioned, the numbers don&#039;t go nearly as high as they do for chemical screens [I&#039;ve seen SPFs of up to 110 here LOL].

Josh, I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s already available where you are but I know that La Roche-Posay is releasing an entirely titanium-dioxide-based [no zinc oxide] product in the States this month that supposedly rates at SPF 50/PPD 21 called &#039;Anthelios 50 Mineral&#039; with an &#039;Ultra Light&#039; consistency ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed this article, Colin. It&#8217;s great to hear a cosmetic chemist&#8217;s perspective on the issue of sunscreens. I&#8217;m currently experimenting more with physical sunscreens myself, as I have sensitive skin and most chemical sunscreens always seem to sting when I apply them. It seems that there are an increasing number of SPF 30 and higher physical screens becoming available here, as dermatologists in the US seem to really push a minimum of SPF 30 for daily facial use, though, as you mentioned, the numbers don&#8217;t go nearly as high as they do for chemical screens [I've seen SPFs of up to 110 here LOL].</p>
<p>Josh, I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s already available where you are but I know that La Roche-Posay is releasing an entirely titanium-dioxide-based [no zinc oxide] product in the States this month that supposedly rates at SPF 50/PPD 21 called &#8216;Anthelios 50 Mineral&#8217; with an &#8216;Ultra Light&#8217; consistency ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://colinsbeautypages.co.uk/sunscreens-why-you-should-use-them-daily/comment-page-1/#comment-44507</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colinsbeautypages.co.uk/?p=120#comment-44507</guid>
		<description>Hi Colin,

I really enjoy reading your articles and find this one very refreshing (and I agree with you completely).

I wonder if you could do more on sunscreens and in particular UV protection and alternative methods?

I&#039;m particularly interested in hearing your perspective on alternative ingredients that might protect against UV damage. I&#039;ve read a number of stories on various cosmetic industry news sites over the years about ingredients like broccoli extract providing superb protection in tests, yet, years later it&#039;s not appearing (that I can find) in any products. Others like lycopene are also mentioned often but are incredibly hard to find in a finished product.

I struggle with traditional sunscreens. I find chemical ones have the best finish but they usually irritate my skin. Zinc oxide also irritates my skin (I&#039;ve tried dozens of formulas, keeping a spreadsheet of all the ingredients and even tried the powder on it&#039;s own mixed into a cream that doesn&#039;t irritate my skin so I know it does). The only filter I&#039;m left with is titanium dioxide and elegant formulas containing it are few and far between. Hence my interest in alternatives!

Thanks a lot and keep up the great work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Colin,</p>
<p>I really enjoy reading your articles and find this one very refreshing (and I agree with you completely).</p>
<p>I wonder if you could do more on sunscreens and in particular UV protection and alternative methods?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m particularly interested in hearing your perspective on alternative ingredients that might protect against UV damage. I&#8217;ve read a number of stories on various cosmetic industry news sites over the years about ingredients like broccoli extract providing superb protection in tests, yet, years later it&#8217;s not appearing (that I can find) in any products. Others like lycopene are also mentioned often but are incredibly hard to find in a finished product.</p>
<p>I struggle with traditional sunscreens. I find chemical ones have the best finish but they usually irritate my skin. Zinc oxide also irritates my skin (I&#8217;ve tried dozens of formulas, keeping a spreadsheet of all the ingredients and even tried the powder on it&#8217;s own mixed into a cream that doesn&#8217;t irritate my skin so I know it does). The only filter I&#8217;m left with is titanium dioxide and elegant formulas containing it are few and far between. Hence my interest in alternatives!</p>
<p>Thanks a lot and keep up the great work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does eating sugar give you wrinkles? &#124; Colin's Beauty Pages</title>
		<link>http://colinsbeautypages.co.uk/sunscreens-why-you-should-use-them-daily/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Does eating sugar give you wrinkles? &#124; Colin's Beauty Pages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colinsbeautypages.co.uk/?p=120#comment-315</guid>
		<description>[...] won&#8217;t ever be shown that sugar causes premature wrinkles in the skin. Things like smoking and sun exposure are so significant in skin ageing, that I think that these factors are much more significant. And [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] won&#8217;t ever be shown that sugar causes premature wrinkles in the skin. Things like smoking and sun exposure are so significant in skin ageing, that I think that these factors are much more significant. And [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

